Neither Duck nor Non-Duck

Yet again, the truth, as it so often does, lies midway between the extremes.

Via xkcd; h/t Rust Never Sleeps


5 thoughts on “Neither Duck nor Non-Duck

  1. By the way, if anyone understands the immediately preceding xkcd strip, I'd appreciate an explanation. Call me thick but I really don't see the point.

  2. Johnmac says:

    Looks like the brillaint design with umbrella doesn't work – they get wet.

  3. GRLCowan says:

    My explanation of strip 689 would be that the cartoonist has some off days.Much earlier, the guy with the hat saw through, George Nada-style, the whole 9-11 hoax, and revealed that the towers are still standing.(How fire can be domesticated)

  4. marcus says:

    The umbrella strip: you have to be familiar with the various competitions at MIT and other places where the competitors build robots in order to do things like put balls into holding containers. Often there's a balance between designing a robot that is really good at ball pushing, and designing a robot that are really good at messing up the other robot (and, of course, designing robots that are robust to the other robot). So, this particular robot was designed to set off the sprinkler system in other to kill its competition, but the umbrella keeps it dry enabling it to still get points by pushing balls around. Does that help? I never took any of the robot design classes, but had enough friends who did that I still found the strip funny…

  5. marcus, makes perfect sense, thanks!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s